Richard Seidl
Test design techniques are an essential tool for effectively testing and verifying the quality of IT systems. Despite their importance, they are still underutilized by many testers. These techniques can be divided into four main groups, and it is crucial to master at least one or two from each group in order to be able to react flexibly to different requirements. Choosing the right method depends heavily on the problem at hand, and specific recommendations can help to optimize the testing strategy. The correct application of these techniques contributes significantly to a structured and successful testing process.
Podcast episode on test design techniques
In this episode, I talk to Rik Marselis about test design techniques. Rik, who has been teaching these techniques for nearly 25 years, shared his thoughts on why so many testers underutilize them. He explains why these methods are so important, especially if you want to prove the quality of IT systems. We also talk about how test design techniques can be categorized into four main types and why it’s crucial for testers to know at least one or two techniques from each group. Rik shares his three favorite techniques and gives tips on how to choose the right technique for a particular problem.
“So we make them aware of the fact that basically there are four things relevant for selecting a test design technique: the kind of testing problem, the quality characteristic, the risk level, and the skills of the involved people.” - Rik Marselis
Rik Marselis is a senior quality consultant at Sogeti in the Netherlands. He is a respected speaker, trainer, author, consultant and coach who has helped many organizations and individuals improve their quality development and testing practices by providing tools and checklists, practical support and deep discussions. His presentations are always appreciated for their vividness and his use of practical examples with humorous comparisons.
Highlights of the Episode
- Test design techniques are essential to demonstrate coverage and ensure the quality of IT systems.
- TMAP certification now focuses on a smaller selection of techniques to improve their learning and application.
- Practical examples and templates can help testers to better understand and apply the techniques.
- Developers, who are often focused on code coverage, can benefit from test design techniques such as equivalence class building.
- Teaching and applying test design techniques in different test environments can provide valuable insights.
Why test design techniques are often overlooked and how to use them effectively
Why are test design techniques not frequently used?
Test design techniques provide a structured basis for testing IT systems, but their use is still not widespread - even though some of them have been around for a long time. One of the main reasons for this is that testers often find it difficult to transfer them into practice. According to ISTQB and TMAP, the combination of experience-based methods such as exploratory testing and structured test design techniques provides comprehensive coverage and increases confidence in the functionality of a system.
The challenge of diversity
Another stumbling block is the large number of available test design techniques. According to research findings, there are actually around 25 to 30 techniques. This variety can overwhelm testers and make selection difficult. However, focusing on five central techniques offers a practicable solution: equivalence class formation, limit value analysis, path testing, decision tables and syntactic testing. In addition, exploratory testing plays an important role as an experience-based method.
Categorization of test design techniques
Test design techniques can be divided into four main categories: process-oriented techniques (e.g. path testing), condition-oriented techniques (e.g. decision tables), data-oriented techniques (e.g. equivalence class formation) and appearance-oriented techniques (e.g. syntactic testing). Understanding these categories makes it easier to select suitable methods. The use of suitable methods is crucial for different problems - for example, a condition-oriented method would be ineffective for a data-oriented problem. If you have mastered at least one or two methods from each category, you have a versatile tool set at your disposal.
Practical application of the techniques
Implementing these methods in day-to-day work can be difficult without suitable tools. Some methods, such as limit value analysis, are so intuitive that they are often applied unconsciously. More complex approaches such as decision tables, on the other hand, benefit from standardized templates, for example from TMAP. Such templates facilitate correct and efficient application and lower the inhibition threshold when using them.
Training courses and practical examples
An effective introduction to test design methods requires training based on real examples. Applying these methods to specific processes, such as those carried out by business analysts, increases understanding and acceptance. This practical approach shows the direct benefit of the methods in the respective work context and facilitates their use.
Fazit
Test design techniques are an indispensable tool for high-quality and comprehensive software testing. By focusing on key methods, understanding the categories and using templates and training, testers can efficiently integrate these techniques into their daily work. This leads to a more systematic and well-founded quality assurance of IT systems.
Frequently asked questions about test design techniques
-
What are test design techniques?
Test design techniques are systematic approaches to creating test cases in software development. They help to select from the multitude of possible tests those that are most likely to uncover errors. The main categories include specification-based (black-box), structure-based (white-box), experience-based and risk-based methods. Each category offers different techniques to ensure the quality and reliability of software.
-
What types of test design techniques are there?
There are different types of test design techniques that are used in software development. The most important include specification-based methods, which are based on requirements, structure-based methods, which analyze the code, experience-based methods, which are based on the tester’s experience, and risk-based methods, which focus on potential risks. Each method has its own strengths and is selected according to the test objective.
-
What is the difference between black box and white box testing?
Black box testing, also known as specification-based testing, tests the functionality of software without knowledge of the internal code. Testers focus on inputs and expected outputs based on requirements. White-box testing, on the other hand, analyzes the internal structure and code of the software. Testers create test cases to cover specific code paths and ensure that all internal operations work correctly.
-
When should you use experience-based testing?
Experience-based test techniques are particularly useful when there are no formal requirements or there is time pressure. They rely on the tester’s knowledge and intuition to identify potential failure points. This method is effective in projects with unclear specifications or in early development phases where quick feedback is required. It complements formal testing methods and can help to uncover unexpected problems.
-
How does risk-based testing work?
In risk-based testing, test resources are concentrated on areas with the highest risk. The first step is to identify potential risks, assess their probability and impact and prioritize them accordingly. Test cases are then developed that are specifically aimed at minimizing these risks. This approach ensures that critical parts of the system are tested intensively in order to identify and rectify serious errors at an early stage.
-
What is model-based testing?
Model-based testing is an approach in which tests are created on the basis of formal models of the system to be tested. These models represent the expected behavior of the software and serve as the basis for the automatic generation of test cases. This systematic approach allows tests to be created and maintained more efficiently, which improves quality assurance in complex projects.
-
What are the advantages of specification-based test techniques?
Specification-based test techniques, also known as black box tests, test the software based on its requirements and specifications. They make it possible to uncover functional errors without knowing the source code. The advantages are the early detection of deviations between requirements and implementation, the validation of user requirements and independence from the development team, which leads to more objective test results.
-
How to choose the right test design method?
The selection of the appropriate test design method depends on several factors: Type and complexity of the software, available resources, project goals and risk assessments. For safety-critical systems, for example, structured and risk-based techniques make sense, while experience-based approaches can be helpful for unclear requirements. A combination of different methods can often increase test coverage and efficiency.
-
What are the challenges when using test design techniques?
When using test design methods, challenges such as incomplete or unclear requirements, time and resource constraints and the complexity of modern software systems can arise. In addition, selecting the appropriate method requires specialist knowledge and integration into agile development processes can be difficult. Careful planning and continuous adaptation of test strategies are therefore essential.
-
How to integrate test design techniques into agile development processes?
In agile development processes, test design techniques are used iteratively and continuously. Testers work closely with developers and product owners to understand requirements and create suitable test cases. Automated tests and regular reviews ensure that new functions are implemented correctly. Flexibility and rapid adaptation of test strategies are crucial in order to meet the dynamic requirements of agile methods.