Risk based testing
Risk-based testing can help to significantly improve test coverage in software projects and minimize potential risks in testing, especially in the...
The introduction of agile test plans in a classically structured federal authority shows how even complex organizations can break new ground. Initiated by an acute need for action, a modular testing and quality assurance toolkit was created that provides practice-oriented knowledge tailored to requirements - from basic articles and videos to concrete exercises. A community of practice supports the exchange between project participants and promotes the transfer of knowledge within the organization. Rigid documentation is replaced by application-oriented solutions that motivate cooperation and take different types of learners into account. Step by step, this creates a change that is not based on system architecture, but on shared understanding and genuine collaboration.
In this episode, I talk to Simone and Oliver from the Federal Office of Administration about a topic that sounds dry, but has a lot of spice: Test plans. If you're thinking of meaningless wastelands of text, you're wrong. The two show how to find agile, lightweight approaches even in a public authority environment with over 100 specialist procedures and a strict framework. Their QA toolkit is more of an info point than a catalog of regulations - modular, practical and easy to understand. Sharing knowledge, breaking down silos and driving real change. And the whole thing is now open source.
"At some point, we refused to write heavyweight concepts that end up in a drawer." - Simone Mester, Oliver Kortendick
Dr. Oliver Kortendick studied ethnology and sociology in Göttingen, Amsterdam and Cologne. Doctorate and subsequent several years of research on quantitative, computer-aided content analysis. Research Fellow at the Center for Social Anthropology and Computing in Canterbury, Kent. For 25 years as a software developer, project manager and testing and QA manager in large-scale projects. Since 2015, strategy consultant for software testing and quality assurance at the Federal Office of Administration in Cologne.
Simone Mester looks back on many years of experience as a software developer in the insurance environment, but in recent years she has been drawn to the "test and QA" side. She has been working in the public sector since 2015. Special interest: Lightweight processes to support team building and group coherence in an agile approach. Co-founder of the Community of Practice "Forum for Test and Quality Assurance" at BVA, co-moderator of the CoP "Test and QA" of the federal Next network.
Lightweight test plans are becoming increasingly important for modern software development teams. These concepts offer a flexible and effective approach to the test process that has proven itself in agile environments.
What are lightweight test plans?
**Why are agile methods important for the test process?
The challenges of traditional testing methods:
Understanding these concepts is critical to optimizing test strategies in a dynamic development environment.
The public sector faces many challenges. Bureaucratic structures and rigid processes often make it difficult to adapt and work efficiently. Traditional methods such as the V-model XT are reaching their limits. This model, which has long been considered the standard, requires extensive documentation and has proven impractical in agile environments. In reality, requirements often change quickly, which hinders a fixed model.
Agile transformation offers a promising alternative. Agile methods enable teams to work more flexibly and react more quickly to changes. Iterative processes not only make the test process more efficient, but also more transparent. The focus on collaboration ensures that everyone involved develops a common understanding and takes responsibility for the quality of the end product.
The implementation of lightweight test plans in the public sector can help to overcome these challenges. Instead of extensive manuals, the focus is on pragmatic solutions. A minimum viable testing strategy could represent an innovative test strategy that allows you to react quickly and effectively to changes. This not only promotes the quality of the software, but also employee satisfaction through improved communication and knowledge sharing.
The implementation of agile methods in the public sector represents a significant challenge. To overcome this, initiatives such as the QA-Kit have become increasingly important. This toolkit enables public authorities to effectively integrate agile principles while focusing on practical solutions.
An important aspect is Communities of Practice. These communities promote the exchange of knowledge and enable employees to share their experiences and best practices with each other. Regular meetings allow different perspectives and approaches to solutions to be discussed.
Sharing experiences between different projects and departments plays a crucial role in learning from common challenges. This allows teams to benefit from the successes and failures of others, which strengthens the collective knowledge base.
In summary, agile methods, supported by a well-structured QA kit and active communities of practice, offer the opportunity to significantly improve the efficiency and quality of test processes in the public sector. In this context, it is also important to take a critical look at the test pyramid and adapt it to bring it into line with agile methods.
The QA Kit is an innovative example of lightweight test plans with a modular structure. This flexibility allows users to target information to meet their specific requirements. Unlike traditional test manuals, which are often hundreds of pages long and rarely used in practice, the QA Kit offers a user-friendly solution.
Traceability](https://www.richard-seidl.com/de/blog/testmanagement) plays a central role in the test process. A well-structured QA kit makes it possible to transparently show the connection between requirements and testing. This not only makes it easier to identify gaps in test coverage, but also promotes communication between different teams and projects. Taking traceability into account at an early stage significantly reduces the effort required when changes or adjustments are necessary.
Additionally, it is important to understand the different test levels. These provide structure for testing and help to target different areas of the software. A clearly defined QA kit can thus serve not only as a requirements management tool, but also as a comprehensive test design procedure with high traceability and a clear test strategy.
The QA Kit provides a structured way for self-assessment and maturity measurement of teams in the test process. Teams can use various modules of the kit to evaluate their current status and make targeted improvements. The use of maturity models makes it possible to measure progress in different areas of testing.
Specific steps for continuous improvement in testing through the use of the QA kit include:
This iterative approach not only increases the quality of the tests, but also strengthens the team spirit, as all members are actively involved in the improvement process.
The implementation of lightweight test plans in large organizations poses numerous challenges, especially due to existing hierarchies and cooperation with external service providers.
In large authorities or companies, there are often several levels of decision-making structures that can slow down the innovation process.
The desire for standardized processes often leads to rigid specifications that hinder agile approaches.
Testing expertise is often held by external service providers, which makes it difficult to involve internal teams in the learning process.
These factors limit agility, which makes successful implementation of lightweight test plans more difficult. The need for a flexible approach and open communication is undisputed in order to overcome these hurdles and manage change effectively. In particular, the role of the test manager in agile projects can be crucial to ensure quality assurance and efficient team collaboration.
The implementation of lightweight test plans, especially the QA kit, has provided significant insights into user acceptance. Here are some key points:
These aspects illustrate how agile methods combined with lightweight test plans can not only increase efficiency, but also increase team satisfaction and engagement.
Lightweight test plans are simplified approaches to testing that are geared towards modern software development teams. They are important because they offer flexibility and adaptability, which is crucial in agile environments.
Agile methods promote an iterative and collaborative approach that enables teams in the public sector to respond more quickly to change and increase the quality of software through continuous feedback.
Traditional testing methods are often rigid and bureaucratic, leading to delays and insufficient adaptability. Agile approaches, on the other hand, allow for a faster response to requirements and promote collaboration between team members.
A QA toolkit is a modular approach that integrates test strategy, test design procedures and traceability. It provides a user-friendly structure that helps teams to plan and execute tests more efficiently.
Communities of practice promote the exchange of knowledge between different projects and departments. They support teams in sharing best practices and exchanging experiences, which contributes to the successful implementation of agile methods.
A QA toolkit enables self-assessment and maturity measurement of teams. By taking concrete steps towards continuous improvement, organizations can optimize their test processes and sustainably increase the quality of their software.
Risk-based testing can help to significantly improve test coverage in software projects and minimize potential risks in testing, especially in the...
The transition from monolithic systems to a microservice architecture brings with it various challenges, particularly with regard to optimizing the...
In the development of autonomous driving functions and safety-critical systems, coping with increasing complexity is a key challenge. A proven...